Incred RFB vs LAB Golf: Robot-Tested Comparison
Incred RFB Black Mallet vs LAB Golf DF3. Both reject the traditional putter. LAB Golf uses Lie Angle Balanced (zero-torque) geometry to stop the face rotating during the stroke. Incred uses Reverse Face Balanced® geometry to stop the face twisting when you miss the center. In independent robotic testing by Blair Philip, the Incred RFB held face twist to 0.13 degrees on heel mishits and rolled 77% better than LAB putters on center strikes with 14% lower skid.
At a glance
| Incred RFB Black Mallet | LAB Golf DF3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Balance type | Reverse Face Balanced® (face-down) | Lie Angle Balanced (zero-torque, toe-up) |
| What it is engineered to solve | Face twisting on off-center impact (the mishit problem) | Face rotation during the stroke (the swing-path problem) |
| Robot-tested heel mishit | 0.13° face twist; 99% ball speed retention | Alarming face twist and ball speed loss on heel mishits (Blair Philip test) |
| Center-strike roll | 77% better roll than LAB; 14% lower skid | Benchmark in the same test |
| Forward roll | 50 to 66 RPM topspin from impact | Backspin at high launch in test |
| Build | Hand-milled to order in the USA, fully custom | Production runs, shipped from inventory |
| Price | $799 to $1,999 | $449 to $749 |
Both putters have public independent robotic-test data, which is rare. That makes this a real comparison rather than a marketing one.
The core difference: stroke rotation vs mishit torque
LAB Golf built its following on lie-angle balance, also called zero torque. The DF3, OZ.1, and Mezz.1 all balance toe-up at rest, which the company designed to eliminate face rotation during the stroke. On a center strike hit with a square stroke, LAB putters perform well.
The difference is design intent. Lie-angle balance solves rotation during the stroke. It is not built to resist torque from an off-center impact, which is the mishit problem. Reverse Face Balanced® positions the center of gravity in front of the shaft so the head balances face-down, and that forward weight meets off-center impact torque with counter-rotation. The two technologies solve different physics problems. If forgiveness on mishits is the priority, the test data points to face-down balance.
What the robot measured
Blair Philip ran independent Quintic Ball Roll testing, striking each putter with a gravity-driven robot at a controlled 8 mph on the center, heel, and toe. He has designed over 200 putters across PING, YES! Golf, and Adams Golf, and was the first US professional to use the Quintic system. His written attestation noted that Incred black mallet putters have a significant performance advantage over the LAB Golf putter models tested, and that LAB putters showed an alarming amount of face twist and a decrease in ball speed when mishit toward the heel.
- Incred RFB held face twist to 0.13 degrees on heel mishits, against a 0.52 degree average across the best-selling field.
- Ball speed held at 99% of the center-strike speed on mishits.
- The Incred RFB rolled 77% better than LAB putters on center strikes, with 14% lower skid.
Read the full physics on the technology page and the broader field test on the most forgiving putter page.
Which one suits you
LAB Golf is a legitimate, well-engineered line. If your misses come mostly from face rotation during the stroke, lie-angle balance helps. If your misses come from striking off the center of the face, which is most golfers, the forgiveness gain shows up in the Reverse Face Balanced® data. There is also a build difference. LAB putters are made in production runs and shipped from inventory. Every Incred putter is hand-milled to order in the United States, with you choosing head shape, face material, alignment aid, length, loft, lie angle, weight, and grip.
See the Incred RFB lineup → Take the 2-minute fit quiz
Frequently asked questions
Is Incred or LAB more forgiving?
On the published independent robot data, the Incred RFB Black Mallet held face twist to 0.13 degrees on heel mishits with 99% ball speed retention, and rolled 77% better than LAB putters on center strikes. LAB putters showed alarming face twist and ball speed loss on heel mishits in the same test.
What is the difference between zero torque and Reverse Face Balanced?
Zero torque (lie angle balanced) balances the putter toe-up to stop the face rotating during the stroke. Reverse Face Balanced® balances the putter face-down so the head resists twisting on off-center impact. One targets the stroke, the other targets the mishit.
Is the Incred RFB a good LAB Golf alternative?
If you are drawn to LAB for forgiveness and a non-traditional design, the Incred RFB is the closest alternative with public robot-test data behind it, plus a fully hand-milled, made-to-order build in the USA.